In roughly descending order of how much they piss me off
-
"It's a legal issue" (Almost never from an actual
lawyer or even someone who has talked to one)
-
"It's an antitrust issue" (Specialization of legal)
-
"It's a bizops issue" (Generalization of legal)
-
"It's a scale issue" (Or "that costs too much
cpu time / disk space")
-
"It's a perf issue" (Same as above)
-
"It's a privacy issue"
-
"It's a security issue"
-
"[Exec XX] just doesn't like it that way"
-
"It's a test bandwidth issue"
-
"What's the market size?" (An argument you can
never win unless someone else has already done it - at which point
the assumption is always that we will win all existing market
share but never that we will grow the size of the market.)
-
"Do you have a fully detailed business model?" (Often by
the time you get this done, you could have just launched the damn
thing)
-
"Have you done focus groups / user testing / market
research?"
-
"We're fully booked until 2006"
-
"We're fixing that in Longhorn"
Related statements (Contributed anonymously)
-
"We should do it this way instead" (at the 11th hour
from the guy who never read your e-mails or went to the meetings)
-
"Can you keep me in the loop on this?" (From the guy who
will become the guy in number 1.)
Oliver Roup (2004)